REGULARS  
 

:: MCAD
:: Marine
:: Health & Safety
:: New Products
:: Infotech

:: Careers
:: Events
:: Rig Stats
:: Project Focus
:: Project Update
:: New Appointments

 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

 

 

 
     
 

REGULARS >> MCAD

 
     
  Choosing the right piping design and drafting software

If you are in the process of selecting a software programme for your piping design and drafting applications, the following hints and features may assist you in choosing the right software for your company

Ease of Use/Performance
Ease of use is frequently reported as the number one desired characteristic of a CAD system, based on user feedback. In order to improve ease of use it is important that an application uses industry terminology rather than programming terminology. It is also important that an application utilises well-known functions and commands that already exist in popular CAD platforms such as AutoCAD rather than “re-inventing the wheel”. This will greatly improve ease of use and shorten the learning curve.

Program Reliability
Difficult setup and implementation, program crashes, loss of data, loss of customization, and lack of upward compatibility reduce productivity resulting in loss of time and money.

AutoCAD Compliance/Interoperability
Millions of users worldwide are proficient with AutoCAD and the various vertical applications that exist. It stands to reason that the more an application looks and feels like AutoCAD and the more basic and advanced AutoCAD functions supported the more productive a new user will be with that application in a shorter period of time.

Learning Curve
Several factors effect how long it will take the average user to become proficient with a new application. Since many companies that depend on productivity tools for piping are project driven they frequently have high turnover rate with regard to design/drafting personnel. Having an application, which shortens the learning curve of new users, can easily be the difference between profit and loss on any project.

Drawing Production
Deliverable drawings are still the primary focus of AutoCAD users. In the Plant Design arena many projects revolve around existing legacy drawings many of which are flat 2D model space drawings. Many of the owners of these drawings do not have users experienced in developing and maintaining paper space drawings.

Database Integrity
Database integrity is vital to a successful project, loss or corruption of data can severely impact project schedule and cost by adding countless man hours.

Integration with Other Disciplines
It is important for a variety of different disciplines to collaborate and share information on a project. However, many organizations utilise a widely diverse group of applications from discipline to discipline. Many of these applications come from other 3rd party developers and many were developed internally.

Upfront Configuration
The amount of user input in order to begin using a product in a production environment can have a significant impact on the scalability of an application. Less input is desired on any size project but is crucial on small to medium size projects.

Part Numbers and Material Requisition
Automating the purchase of materials required for fabrication is becoming increasingly important to anyone involved in design and construction. This is especially true in organizations that engineer, design and fabricate their designs such as modular fabricators. (Skid mounted units that are either self contained or are shipped in modules that “bolt together” once they arrive on site). Having an easy to generate and maintain system of applying fully customizable part numbers is paramount to this process.

Piping Specifications
Piping specifications (specs) are the life blood of a plant design application. Therefore most piping design systems are typically driven by design specifications which identify items such as piping material, flange pressure rating, pipe schedule, branch connection types, etc. Even though certain aspects of specifications are somewhat “standard” in a given industry, specifications vary greatly from industry to industry and from company to company within an industry. Specifications are often modified frequently throughout the course of a project. Therefore a well structured specification system that simplifies generation and maintenance of specifications is highly valued over a more complex system.

Weights and Centre of Gravity
Complex piping systems are often very heavy. The weight of these systems is usually a critical factor to the engineering and design of the system. Piping systems are often fabricated in shops and shipped to the field partially assembled in order to reduce cost as it is far more cost effective to fabricate in the shop than it is to fabricate on site (better tools, conditions, higher volume, etc.). Being able to accurately and quickly identify the weight and center of gravity of fabricated piping can greatly aid in reducing mistakes, shipping costs and lifting.

Links to other Engineering Analysis Applications such as Pipe Stress Analysis software
Some systems provide a one-way output interface to a stress analysis from the model but these often clutter the model with unnecessary nodes. It is often difficult to maintain an interface between two software applications from two different companies with different development schedules. So, it is important to source a software for your piping design and drafting applications from a software developer who has developed Analysis software with seamless and bi-directional link between “Design” and “Stress Analysis”.

Import From Other Modelling Systems With Intelligence
Projects are often divided among two or more engineering or design firms utilising different systems for modelling. The ability to import 3D models from other systems, with intelligence, can be very important in delivering the final design in a single format.

Cost of Ownership
The tools necessary for a piping designer to create a plant design should be built into one module at one price rather than being broken into separate modules. This results in a much lower per seat cost. Another factor which can increase the cost of ownership is the requirement for additional levels of complexity needed to configure, customise and maintain the software. Of course, the cost for annual updates, maintenance and support must also be considered in this formula.

Amir M. Heshmati is the managing director of ImageGrafix. He can be reached at amheshmati@image-grafix.com

 
     

© Copyright 2002. Reflex Publishing ME FZ LLC. All rights reserved.
Pipeline Magazine, PO Box 53777, Dubai Media City, Dubai, UAE
Tel: +971 4 3910 830 | Fax: +971 4 390 4570 | E-mail - info@pipelinedubai.com