NEWS ROOM  
 

:: Company News

 
     
  ARCHIVE  
  :: 2003  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

COMPANY NEWS

 
     
 

Royal Dutch and Shell Transport received the following advice from Standard and Poors

Posted: 9 July 2004

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has removed its long-term ratings on the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies (Shell) and the group's fully owned subsidiaries Shell Oil Co., Shell Petroleum N.V., and Shell Petroleum Co., Ltd. from CreditWatch, where they had been placed on Jan. 9, 2004. At the same time, Standard & Poor's also affirmed its long- and short-term ratings on Shell and its group entities, at 'AA+' and 'A-1+', respectively. The outlook is negative.

"We view Shell's key current weaknesses - exploration performance along with related governance and internal control issues; increasing upstream investment spending; and shareholder litigation risks - as counterbalanced at the 'AA+' level by the expectation that Shell will maintain its strengths in other areas," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Emmanuel Dubois-Pelerin. "These include the group's very conservative financial profile and policies; very strong and (outside the U.S.) consistently very profitable global downstream operations; and broad portfolio of upstream assets with competitive, though increasing, development and production costs."

Standard & Poor's April 19, 2004 downgrade of its ratings on Shell reflected the group's continued weak reserve-reporting governance; weak reserve replacement (70%-75% on average in recent years); reduced year-end 2002 proved reserves (by 23% or 4.47 billion boe) and thus relatively low proved reserve life (10.2 years at year-end 2003, some 2-2.5 years less than those of peers); and high finding costs (above $1.3/boe or 20%-40% above those of peers, on a 2001-2003 average).

Standard & Poor's expects that Shell's proved-reserve bookings will significantly exceed production during 2004-2005 (including the rebooking of some of the volumes recategorized as non-proved in early 2004), as several major projects - already sanctioned Kashagan in Kazakhstan and Ormen Lange in Norway, and potentially Gorgon in Australia - come to fruition.

Shell's overall governance structure in the past has been weaker than expected for the 'AA+' rating category. The outcome of the group's review of its dual-parent structure will be announced in

November 2004. Standard & Poor's views positively the actions Shell has already taken in order to address the governance weaknesses identified by the Davis Polk & Wardwell enquiry, but remains concerned by, notably, a relative lack of transparency regarding the dual-ownership review process and the scope of reforms to be implemented. Given the extent of the identified weaknesses, the needed improvements in Shell's internal controls, oversight process, and management culture will take time to be fully implemented and will require ongoing monitoring.

"The ratings on Shell could be lowered, should the group fail to effectively correct its weaknesses in corporate governance and internal controls and to raise proved-reserve bookings significantly above full replacement during the next two years," added Mr.Dubois-Pelerin.

For more information see www.shell.com

Posted by Richard Price, Editor Pipeline Magazine

Information supplied by companies or PR agencies who are responsible for content. Send press releases to info@pipelinedubai.com

 
     

 

© Copyright 2002. Reflex Publishing ME FZ LLC. All rights reserved.
Pipeline Magazine, PO Box 53777, Dubai Media City, Dubai, UAE
Tel: +971 4 3910 830 | Fax: +971 4 390 4570 | E-mail - info@pipelinedubai.com